- Calling school girls "hoes".
- Telling schoolchildren to sit on his lap.
- Asking the children if they were "naughty or nice"?
- Threatening them with a lump of coal in their stockings.
- Letting the students know that he will be breaking into their houses.
The DOE lawyer asks Santa Claus why he kept telling the girls in the class that they are Hoes? Santa Claus responds by saying "I said Ho, Ho, Ho. Not that they are Hoes". The DOE lawyer states that Hoe and Ho are the same and the girls complained that they believed he was calling them Hoes. The DOE lawyer asks Santa Claus why did he want to know what sexual deeds did the girls do? Santa replied that he meant naughty as nice not sexual things. The DOE lawyer then brings up why did he threaten them with coal in their stockings if they didn't act nice? Santa Claus responds: "That is my way to encourage them to do the right things in life". The DOE lawyer states that sounds like you are scaring them. Santa Claus responds. "I was trying to get them to be good". The DOE lawyer then asked "haven't you asked the students to sit on your lap"? Santa Claus responds. "Yes". Don't you think that is a sexual act? Santa replied "no it is just a show of affection" The DOE lawyer asked Santa "didn't you tell the children that they will not get presents if they don't behave"? Santa replied "yes". The DOE lawyer then asks didn't you tell the children that you will break into their house when they are sleeping? Santa Claus responds. "Yes, but only on Christmas Eve". So you admit to threatening them with breaking and entering into their homes? Santa Claus responds. "I guess so". Finally, is it true that you tried to bribe the children with presents if they sat on your lap?
Santa Claus responds. "I was not trying to bribe them".
In his closing statement the DOE lawyer states the following. The DOE has proved his case that Santa Claus is guilty of the following offenses.
- Sexual misconduct of a verbal nature in calling the girls Hoes.
- Sexual misconduct of a physical nature by forcing the children to sit on his lap.
- Corporal Punishment by threatening them with a lump of coal in their stockings,
- Verbal Abuse by threatening them with no presents for being naughty.
- Felony criminal charge of "breaking & entering" and "bribing" the children
8 comments:
I see a lump of coal in the Chancellor's stocking this year.
Hope he doesn't put it in one of those waffles he feeds the kids.
This is hysterical. Or sad because it rings too close to the truth. Good job!
Another victim of the DoE's heavy-handedness of an unfair hearing.
At least the public knows that Santa is truly innocent and the Grinches at Tweed will get their karma.
Remember Bloomballbuster's day is so numbered!
Get piece.
Hilarious, but loosely based on actual happenings!
This post reminded me of the old joke, "Why did Santa Claus get his face slapped three times?"
Answer: "Because he went up to three girls at a bar and said, 'Ho, ho, ho!'"
it is good opportunity. medicaid billing may be complicated, but the company is helping.
Estetik
A bit cynical for my taste but you surely make a point. There is little doubt there are many teachers dismissed, fined, or otherwise disciplined for innocuous conduct. When a teacher (or anyone for that matter) is so poorly treated there is more going wrong than just an out of control DOE disciplinary unit. The bottom line is that there is no push back for this shameful DOE behavior. Our Union is largely silent and continues to defend our members in the same ineffective way they have for many years. Of course once the Union caves on evaluations the DOE hit squad won't need much to get rid of any teacher.
chaz:
I think it is hilarious!
I have done a few videos myself. I need some more practice though:-)
Rinoplasti
Post a Comment