Thursday, June 21, 2018
UFT President Michael Mulgrew loudly proclaimed victory in negotiating with the City on parental leave. At first glance, it does not seem to contain "givebacks" but on further analysis there is a "giveback". The union agreed to extend the existing contract 73 days, from November 30, 1918 to February 11th, 2019. That means when you add the 16 days delayed for the final 3% raise we gave up to fund the massive retirements in 2014, that means our existing contract was actually 10% for 7.25 years or annual raises of only 1.38%!
The union leadership and their acolytes will claim that there are no "givebacks" but to me, time delayed and the extension of an existing contract is a "giveback". Moreover, it only pertains to parental leave not the more expansive family leave that allows members to take for caring of a sick relative., a plan that would allow all members to benefit, not just a select segment of the membership.
Compare our union leadership's negotiation with the one public worker union, the United University Professionals (UUP) who negotiated z family leave plan in their new contract. Here.
If you read the article you will find that the UUP negotiated up to 10 weeks of family leave and that will increase to twelve weeks by 2021. More importantly, there were no "givebacks" and in fact, thee were enhancements. So let the UFT declare victory but now you know the truth.
Wednesday, June 20, 2018
A New York State court ruled that the Success Academy Teacher Certification requirements would result in inexperienced and unqualified teachers to be in the classroom and enjoined the charter network to proceed with their teacher evaluation plan for next year.
The reason that the carter network wanted the weakened teacher certification plan was their inability to recruit and retain state certified teachers. High teacher turnover is a major problem for charter schools as long hours, lack of "due process" and inferior benefits make teachers leave for the public schools. Moreover, the charter schools have a difficult job in recruiting certified teachers in the first place.
Presently, only 15% of the teaching staff in charter schools can be uncertified, and the charter schools have a difficult time attracing certified teachers and that's why the charter schools wanted the weakened teacher certification system.
The court decision can be found Here.
Monday, June 18, 2018
Three seems to be a small shift on how the DOE are handling principals who are acting badly under the new Chancellor, Richard, Carranza. Fist it was Howard Kwait, who was removed by the Chancellor from John Bowne High School in Queens and now it's Steven Dorcely of Urban Action Academy in the Carnarsie campus in Brooklyn who was removed due to sexual harassment of female subordinates. Interestingly, Mr. Dorcely, a Leadership Academy Principal, was first in the news back in July of 2016 due to Regents cheating, cyber bullying, and poor academics. You can read it Here.
The other Principal in the news is the Principal of troubled DeWitt Clinton High School in the Bronx who has been accused of passing students who never attended class by giving them a "quickie mastery packet" which they can do at home. The Principal, Pierre Orbe, has apparently didn't learn from the previous Principal who was removed for similar abuses. Will the DOE also removed Mr. Orbe? Only time will tell.
While I see the DOE taking Principal abuses more seriously. there still is a "double standard" on how teachers are treated compared to administrators and that must end. Let's see what the Chancellor does with the infamous Namita Dwarka of William Cullen Bryant High School in Queens.
Sunday, June 17, 2018
Mayor Bill de Blasio's ill advised proposal on how to achieve some semblance of diversify has stirred up a backlash, mainly by East Asian parents and their political allies. In addition, the Republican controlled State Senate has splashed cold water on the Mayor's plan to diversify the three Specialized High Schools which are Brooklyn Tech, Bronx High School of Science, and Stuyvesant.
The Mayor's plan would set aside 20% for low income students and he would scrap the Specialized school test altogether and allow the top academic students of every middle school in the City to be given a seat, based on their school grades and the State test scores. There are major problems with the Mayor's approach.
First and foremost, .the Mayor's plan will allow for every student accepted by the school, another, more deserving student will be rejected. His "robbing Peter to pay Paul" is not only discriminating against higher academic students but ignores the mission of the specialized schools, to nurture the top students in the City and provide a college like curriculum and atmosphere.
Second, if the Mayor's proposal is implemented, that would set aside seats in the specialized high schools based on middle school grades, which is subjective and subject to grade inflation. Then what happens when those students who were accepted but cannot handle the tough academic environment of the specialized schools? Will the Mayor allow them to transfer out or pressure the specialized schools to dumb down the curriculum? My guess is the later.
Third, the Mayor's plan to use the State competency test is a poor replacement for the significantly harder specialized school test which is based upon selecting the top academic talent in the City.
Finally, the Mayor's plan discriminates against the high achieving Asian community and to a lesser degree, the White neighborhoods. Moreover, it also discriminates against the middle class community's middle schools, which have more high academic achieving students than the City as a whole. Finally, under the Mayor's plan the specialized schools will no longer be elite.
My plan would be to provide free or low cost test prep for all middle school students who have ambitions to be accepted to the specialized high schools and pay for it by one or more of the following.
- Take it from the City's budget surplus.
- Eliminate the ATR pool and the $136 million it costs by placing ATRs into vacancies before schools can hire new teachers.
- Reduce the administrative bloat at the DOE
Friday, June 15, 2018
The nonpartisan and anti-teacher Citizen's Budget Commission (CBC) in an error filed analysis blasted the City and the UFT that allows teachers to remain in the ATR pool indefinitely. According to the CBC report, the ATR pool costs the DOE $136 million dollars in the school year Their solution? Give the ATRs a six month time limit. While I do not question the number, I do question the CBC's motives and their lack of exploring the real cause of the ATR pool..
In the next few months the City will be negotiating with the unions, including the UFT. The City will most certainly ask for an ATR time limit as they have done since the creation oif the ATR pool. Just as certain, the UFT will reject an ATR time limit, reminding the City of the deal that was made between DOE's Chancellor Joel Klein and UFT President, Randi Weingarten that allowed principals to hire whom they pleased while excessing veteran teachers into the ATR pool. Part of the sleazy DOE-UFT agreement was that there would not be a time limit for excessed teachers who enter the ATR pool. From the day the infamous 2005 contract was signed, Chancellor Joel Klein has tried to get the UFT to agree to an ATR time limit and has pushed the media to write articles that condemn the ATR pool. From the Liberal New York Times to the Reformy Chalkbeat, to the Conservative Wall Street Journal and New York Post, all the media demonizes the ATR pool.
Since Joel Klein left the DOE the three other Chancellors have also pushed fir a time limit and to the union's credit, they point out that the time limit is non-negotiable since it was part of the new hiring process agreed to by both parties in 2005. Moreover, if the union was to accept an ATR time limit, the other municipal unions would loudly object and probably sue as a violation of the Civil Service law since it would set a slippery slope of diminished worker "due process" as all unions under "collective bargaining" would be forced to accept having excessed members who no longer can bump less senior members out of their job and with an arbitrary time limit can be fired.
The CBC's report fails to discuss the real culprit of the ATR pool,which is Fair Student Funding that penalizes principals who hire veteran teachers and incentivizes schools to "hire the cheapest and not the best teachers" for their school. It's too bad that the CBC report failed to address the deeper issues like school based fair student funding, large class sizes, poor leadership, and tight school budgets as the real causes of academic underachievement.
Monday, June 11, 2018
I have written previously that academic fraud is quite common in the New York City public school system. Be it bogus credit recovery, scholarship, changing grades, or administrative pressure, academic fraud is ignored by the DOE.
In today's New York Post there is an article dealing with the academic fraud issue and the newspaper brings up one example that shows how OSI substantiated the test cheating but since the teacher was a favorite of the Principal and Superintendent, instead of the DOE filing 3020-a charges, the teacher merely ended up with a counseling memo.
Apparently the New York Post will be covering the academic fraud issue this week, I can only laugh that the newspaper never addressed the issue under Bloomberg or read Susan Edelman's articles most every Sunday. The funnest quote from today's article is by a DOE spokesman who said the following.
“We treat academic misconduct seriously and take immediate disciplinary action as necessary. We have created an academic integrity task force to enhance training and support to ensure our policies are followed,” said department spokesman Doug Cohen.
The DOE claims that they have zero tolerance for academic misconduct and that is probably true for most teachers but when it comes to administrators and their favorite teachers, the DOE seems to look the other way. The double standard continues no matter who the Chancellor is. Here are two other examples. Here and Here.
Friday, June 08, 2018
If you relied only on the New York City newspapers one would think that Eva Moskiwitz's Success Academy Charter Schools are a success. The truth is that for every student that started in first grade eleven years ago, over three left the school due to various reasons. In the first graduating class 16 students graduated out of 73 first graders. That is a measly 22% graduation rate. What happened to the 78% that left Success Academy?
I venture to guess that the majority of students left, as the school counseled them out. Many students who academically struggled were probably threatened to repeat the grade and behaviorally challenged students were simply kicked out of the school. Others wearied of the intense academic pressure, including summer homework and having few, if any extracurricular activities that makes school a pleasant experience.
Regardless, the "drill and kill" culture of Success Academy Charter School is not for most students and if your child is an English Language Learner or self contained Special Education student, then Eva Moskowitz's Success Academy would counsel you that the public school is a more appropriate environment for your child.