data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30cde/30cde862c239d1a9ede704b451d2113cf6f0104e" alt=""
Study after study has shown that the social-economic influences in a child's family and community are approximately 80% of a student's academic success. How is a child going to learn when there are no books in a house, a parent to help with homework, and worse, allowing the child to roam the streets at all hours of the night! No wonder they are always sleeping in class. Where is the parent's responsibility to make sure that the child actually arrives at school on time , if at all? Are they fed properly? Why fault the school when the parents are the cause of truant and hungry students? That brings me to Michael Goodwin's article that identifies the root cause of poor student academic performance and that is the parents. While I do not agree with some of his conclusions such as Catholic Schools are better, I do agree with him that parents are the primarily cause of student success academically.
While a "quality teacher" small class sizes, and adequate school resources are all important factors in a student's academic success, the most important factor is the student's family and even the Emperor has reluctantly realized it. Instead of wasting money and resources on failed options like
Turnaround schools" the Mayor should spend the money on wraparound services that help support the family structure and their involvement in the schools.
1 comment:
I understand the point about parents. But what are we as teachers and schools to do about bad parenting? Throw up our hands? There are no easy solutions here but expanding the role of the school through hiring lots of social workers is one possible solution. But we can't just ignore it and have everyone suffer.
Post a Comment