Why Doesn't The DOE Hold Superintendent Yolanda Torres Accountable For Her Failure In District 7?

The worst preforming NYC District according to the State is District 7, where only 25% of the student population are proficient in reading.  This abysmal statistic is even worse than nearby District 9 where parents protested the neglect by the DOE of their District.  Yet, despite the academic failure in District 7, the Superintendent, Yolanda Torres, has not been held accountable by the DOE.  How come?  Time and again the DOE claims "no excuses" when teachers and principals claim that poverty is a major factor in student academic achievement and closes the schools  However, I guess accountability is not required by the DOE if you run a failing District like District 7, the worst preforming District in New York City.. 

This is just another case of DOE hypocrisy and "double standard" when it concerns top level administrators who fail in their academic duty to motive the District's students.  I guess for the DOE there are plenty of excuses why they don't hold Superintendent Yolanda Torres accountable for her academic failure. Please read blogger South Bronx Schools on the Administrative failure in District 7 here.

. 

Michael Mulgrew Is A Wuss!

UFT President Michael Mulgrew showed how spineless and uncaring he is about the rank and file by caving in to Chancellor Dennis Walcott's demand that teachers and other UFT staff must give up their winter break to make up the four days that the students were unable to report to school.  The UFT President's surrender to the DOE came without any consultation with the people affected by this terrible decision and despite the fact that we still would have worked the State minimum of 180 days if there are no snow days. How he came up with only 182 days in the school year instead of the actual 184 days to justify taking away our winter break is just typical DOE fuzzy math that our union bought into.

I, for one, thought Michael Mulgrew had more intestinal fortitude than the wuss, Randi Weingarten.  However, I see that I am wrong.  Michael Mulgrew is a wuss who rather follow the dictates of the DOE then what his members want.  I no longer have faith in Michael Mulgrew's inept leadership and hope we have a real leader to replace him when the next election occurs.  For people who do not know what a Wuss is, here is the definition.

Wuss:   A person of dual sissiness. This is actually a combination word. The person this word describes is not only a wuss, he is part wimp and part puss.

Mr. Mayor, Child Poverty Is The Primary Cause For Student Academic Failure Not Their Teachers.

Ex Chancellor Joel Klein and his education reformer friends, which includes hedge fund managers, profiteers, and misguided billionaires such as Bill Gates will tell the media that it's "excellent teachers" and not eliminating poverty that closes the student academic achievement gap. While not true,  unfortunately, they have the ear of many influential politicians such as President Obama, Chris Cristie, Andrew Cuomo and of cause Mayor moneybags himself, Michael Bloomberg.  The reason that these politicians believe the education reformer myth that "excellent teachers" can eliminate the student academic achievement gap is that poverty, the real reason for the student academic achievement gap, is difficult to fix. In fact poverty is actually increasing!

A case in point, he latest poverty statistics for New York City has shown an increase in the City's poverty rate to 20.9% in 2011 up from 20.1% in 2010.  Worse the NYC Public School child poverty rate is an astounding 69% based upon the 2010 figures and might exceed 70% once the 2011 poverty rate numbers are analyzed. In fact 48 schools in the city had student poverty rates of 97% or higher and coincidentally, they have the lowest student academic achievement.  It needs to be noted that the devastation of the superstorm Sandy could increase the student poverty rate when next year's statistics are finalized. Study after study has linked child poverty to poor academic achievement, yet this is a blind spot for education reform groups who simply ignore the poverty issue with their "no excuses" mantra.. The simple reason that Education Reformers ignore poverty is that they realize that there is little they can do about poverty without a massive influx of resources and wraparound services which costs money.  Instead the education reformers look for the cheap way out by falsely claiming that an "excellent teacher" would erase the effects of poverty.   Moreover, by playing the "excellent teacher" card it allows politicians like Mayor Bloomberg to camouflage his dislike for experienced teachers, who cost the City money, pensions, and retiree health benefits, by trying to get rid of seniority and tenure under his education reform agenda.  His real objective to have replaceable and non-tenured teachers who last less than five years and don't have pensions is provided cover with the education reforms he professes to embrace. The reality is it is all about saving money.not helping children.

 Poverty, and its effects are the cause of poor academic achievement and the large student achievement gap, not teachers.  Mr. Mayor, stop blaming teachers for the widening academic achievement gap and blame yourself for your failure to reduce the City's poverty rate.

My Cooperative Learning And Testing Class

I am in a an excellent school, with great students, wonderful peers and a very supportive Administration.  However, even in the best schools there will always be students who have difficulty handling the academic and behavioral discipline of a school environment.  The school, to their credit, has tried various measures to encourage these potential dropouts to finish school and earn a high school diploma.  One way is to create a class environment that separates them from the rest of the student body and give them classes that earn them credits needed to graduate high school.  These classes are for seniors or super seniors who failed in the regular school session.  These "last chance" classes for these struggling students and for the most part, the students do understand and appreciate this final chance to graduate with the rest of the school.  Unfortunately, these classes have been only partially successful as many of these students fail to live up to the academic and/or behavioral discipline that is necessary for graduation.
 
I have one of these classes and in a roster of 34, I have between 12 to 15 who show up on a regular basis.  For the most part, these students are seniors or super seniors who want to get the credits they need to graduate.  However, unlike my other classes, these students suffer from terrible work habits developed over their last 4 to 6 years of secondary school and maybe back to elementary school.  Moreover, since many of them are 18 or older, they have part time jobs or children care duties that interfere with their school attendance. Many of them lack self-esteem and believe nobody cares about them.  The question is how do you get the students to buy into education when the reason they are in the class in the first place is their lack of enthusiasm for education?

There are no real answers to that education question, except to show them that you really do care about their future.  I have found that I am able to reach them by showing that I care about their well-being and listen to their problems.  They respond in kind by trying to do the right thing such as behaving and doing work.  However, a caring teacher is only half the battle for these students to succeed academically. The second part is much more difficult and that is to change their terrible work habits that has been their problem for many years.  A common theme for these students is to do as little work as possible and hope the teacher gives them a 65%.  Unfortunately, many teachers did not pass these students and give up on them during the previous years and in turn, the students gave up on themselves.

At first, I tried to teach my senior class like the rest of my classes and realized that the students were not willing or capable of working like my other classes.  They needed to be given more worksheets and work together in solving problems.  While some teachers may see this, giving out worksheets, is a lazy way to teach, I have found that for this group of students, that giving them worksheets, along with good instruction and making sure the worksheets are rigorous and relevant allowed the students to work in teams and to complete their tasks.  Moreover, I found that giving them a test that allows hem to work together achieved much greater results academically then having them take the test individually.  While I admit their are some drawbacks to this "cooperative testing" approach but at this stage it seems to working.  The students appear more confident academically and their behavioral issues are less. 

While my approach is a "work in progress". I believe it is working and the students have better work habits, are showing academic improvement and with few behavioral issues. Most importantly, attendance is stabilizing and it is good to see the students showing up most every day and willing to work.   I can only hope these little steps by my students academically results in a big step for them, that is graduating in the school.

The Excellent Teacher And The Clueless DOE.

The DOE has time and again claimed that education reform is necessary because they want only "excellent teachers" to instruct the City's students.  Of course the DOE is clueless to what an excellent teacher is.  The DOE's real motive is their "education on the cheap" policies. For Tweed an excellent teacher is an inexpensive and untenured teacher that will not be in the profession long enough to get a pension or retiree health benefits.  In fact Mayor Bloomberg discounted teacher experience by saying teacher experience is not important to student learning. If the DOE really wanted the best teachers in the schools, the first thing they would do is allow principals to hire the "best teachers" and not the cheapest teachers as they are forced to do now.  Previously principals were able to hire the "best teachers" because all teachers cost the same to the school.  The result was that the principals could hire teachers who they believed would be best for the school's students.  However, under Mayor Bloomberg's ex-Chancellor, Joel Klein, came "fair student funding" that hamstrung principals in who they can hire.

Before "fair student funding" fiasco teachers were units and schools could hire who they pleased as long as they didn't exceed the total units allocated to the school.  Therefore, many principals would try to recruit more experienced teachers to instruct the school's students since they know that the "best teachers" are experienced teachers.  The result was that the better schools would end up with the excellent teachers, while the poorly preforming and ineptly Administrated schools would see a merry-go-round of "newbie teachers" and poor student academic outcomes.  The solution of this teacher inequality would have been to encourage experienced teachers to end their stellar careers at these struggling schools by giving them a monetary motive. Chancellor Rudy Crew, the last Chancellor that actually was an educator, came up with the Chancellor's District that paid teachers 15% more money to teach smaller classes in these struggling schools in return for a slightly longer day and with greater teacher resources.  While it was not a complete success, it did bring experienced teachers to these schools and more importantly, did raise the academic achievement of the school's students. Unfortunately, the Bloomberg/Klein Administration in 2003 put an end to the Chancellor's District and these struggling schools and their students were no longer exposed to these top quality experienced teachers.  The result was a new merry-go-around of "newbie teachers" and student academic outcomes plumeted.  Now these schools are based upon a top-down imposed "drill and kill" strategy that replaced real learning with mind-numbing test preparation. Is it any wonder that these struggling schools are either now closed or in danger of closing?

Once, the "fair student funding" fiasco was implemented by Joel Klein's DOE, combined with the terrible 2005 contract that eliminated the requirement that all excessed teachers in a District must be placed before outside teachers can be hired, it became virtually impossible for a Principal to hire an experienced teacher without taking a significant budget hit.  Even replacing one experienced teacher with another could be tricky budget wise since the original teacher's salary may have been "grandfathered" while the replacement is not. This is especially true during the last few years with increasingly tight school budgets and DOE top-down requirements that schools spent a significant part of their budget for non-school based support systems such as the wasteful and unnecessary Children First Networks.

A prime example of the academic failure is the Bloomberg small schools that only seem to have "newbie" and untenured teachers that leave the schools in three to five years.  Many of these small schools are lead by  "Leadership Academy Principals" who have little classroom experience themselves and are encouraged by Tweed to hire the cheapest teachers to stretch their budget  The result is that parents and students who like the idea of small learning communities, instead found large class sizes, a rigid curriculum, and worse, untested and inexperienced teachers who suffered from a steep learning curve when it came to curriculum knowledge and had poor classroom management skills.  The over reliance of inexperienced teachers in these small schools  hurt student academic achievement and collectively the Bloomberg small schools have  terrible "college and career readiness scores" to show for it, averaging an abysmal 10 7% compared to 20.7% for the large comprehensive high schools.

It is too bad that the non-educators at Tweed cannot recognize what good teaching is but what do you expect when eighteen of the twenty top people at Tweed never taught in the classroom themselves?

The DOE Inequalities Of Providing Transportation Services To The Students In The Rockaway Pennnsula.

I read with much amusement the schoolbook article on how the Principal of the elitist Scholar's Academy praised the DOE for providing yellow school buses to transport his students to their temporary digs in East New York and had an attendance rate of 60%.  By contrast, many of the schools in the Rockaway Peninsula had inadequate transportation provided by the DOE to other schools and District 27 had an overall attendance rate of 20% which includes other less affected communities like Howard Beach, Richmond Hill, Woodhaven, Jamaica, and Ozone Park !   Some Rockaway schools' attendance rates were in the single digits The question is how did the elitist Scholars Academy get yellow school buses from the DOE while the rest of the Rockaway Peninsula schools did not have enough?   The answer is very clear to me and that is that the DOE plays favorites and has different rules for different schools.  Let's compare Scholars Academy with a typical Far Rockaway school  such as Rockaway Collegiate which is part of the Far Rockaway Campus.

Scholars Academy.................White/Asian........................Black/Latino
                                      64%                                    35%

Rockaway Collegiate..........White/Asian..............Black/Latino
                                               8%                            88%     

It is obvious from the statistics that Scholars Academy has a majority White and Asian student body.  Moreover,  the school only takes students who scored 3's and 4's on the math and reading tests.  Furthermore,  these students are also screened for absences and punctuality as well before they are accepted into Scholars Academy. Furthermore, only 35% of the students qualify for free lunch meaning that the majority of students come from middle class households. Finally the schools "college readiness scores" is 90%. By contrast, Rockaway Collegiate has 60% of their students qualifying for free lunch which shows that the majority of the school's students live in poverty. Finally, the "college readiness score" is a terrible 3.4%.

Despite all the Bloomberg, Walcott, and Tweed propaganda machine claims that it is "children first".  When it comes to the Rockaway Peninsula it is the "privileged children first" and as for the rest?  They can find their own way to schools that are many miles away can't they?

            
update:  After reading blogger Doenuts commets and talking to a few other people at the Rockaway Complex, they told me that many of the high school students were encouraged to take public transportation because of fears that there were not enough buses available for the first week.  Still it would appear the DOE showed favoritism to Scholars Academy in allocating buses to the schools.

New York City And Long Island Are Forced To Ration Gas As They Are Not Receiving Their Fair Share Of Gasoline.

Odd and even gasoline rationing is being implemented in New York City and Long Island because of the severe gasoline shortage for the area.  It turns out that the often quoted 62% figure was based upon faulty methodology and the actual gasoline supplies to gas stations are a paltry 38% in thee NYC and Long Island regions.   According to Mayor Bloomberg only 25% of gas stations in New York City are open. No wonder there are long gas lines!  The Governor owes all the motorists of New York City and Long Island an apology since it was not drivers topping off their gas tanks but the many gas stations that had no supply of gasoline to sell.

Now it seems the Governor's optimistic forecast that gas lines will disappear by the end of the week is wishful thinking.  Instead the federal energy agency expects gasoline shortages to persist for the rest of the month. Their excuse that too many refiners are either shut down or operating at reduced capacity rings hallow as the rest of the tri-state region has seen adequate gas supplies and no gas lines as a result.  In fact the Department of Energy stated that 72% of the gas stations are open and pumping gasoline as of today.  Well if 72% of the gas stations have gasoline in the NYC Metropolitan area than the Mayor's 38% for NYC and Long Island shows that outside the two areas, there is nearly 100% availability of gas, yet they get the gasoline from the same refineries as NYC and Long Island. How could that be if the same refiners serve the various regions?

I believe there is something very fishy going on here and an investigation needs to be done to find out who or whom are diverting gasoline supplies away from New York City and Long Island that has caused the gas shortage and long lines and no gasoline rationing for New York City and Long Island when there should be none. 

Governor Andrew Cuomo Unfairly Blames Drivers For The Gasoline Shortage.

In a Tuesday afternoon news conference, Governor Andrew Cuomo blamed panicky drivers for the long gas lines in the New York City Metropolitan area.  However, the real problem is that the gasoline distribution system is broken.  At my school in Queens there are six high volume gas stations within walking distance and only one of them had gasoline and they were limiting it to $20 per vehicle.   Further, when I returned to my Long Island community the five gas stations in the area had no gasoline!  That means of the eleven gas stations I saw, only one had gasoline for sale despite all the stations having kept their electricity throughout Hurricane Sandy.

The real problem is that these gas stations are not getting gasoline delivered to their dry gas pumps.  If we are to take the Governor's word that there is plenty of gasoline available at the refineries and fully loaded tankers are coming into New York Harbor continuously, then the gasoline supply problem is the lack of trucks delivering gasoline to the community gas stations. Is it any wonder that what little gasoline is delivered to a community gas station, drivers quickly line up?  If all the gas stations received deliveries of gasoline, there would be no panicky drivers and long gas lines.

Governor Cuomo, it is not panicky drivers but the lack of gasoline deliveries that has caused the long gasoline lines. 

The Biggest Losers After Hurricane Sandy.

After Hurricane Sandy has wrecked damage to the New York Metropolitan area, there are no winners, well maybe President Obama got a bounce being in New Jersey with Governor Christie.  However, there are many losers.  Here is my list of the biggest losers.

People on the Eastern Shore of Staten Island and the Rockaway Peninsula:
Ten thousand people have been left homeless due to the storm surge, strong winds, and fire.  Both areas look like they will not being returning to normal anytime soon.  To a lesser degree, many people near the water on the South shore of Long Island and the New Jersey Coast also saw their houses either flooded or taken off their foundations by the storm surge. However, nothing like the damage and destruction experienced by the two communities.

Thousands of People now jobless:
Many businesses have been destroyed due to the storm surge and flooding and thousands of people lost their jobs for the foreseeable future. In the Rockarway Peninsula almost every business were affected and many may never open again.

LIPA:
Over one million people lost power on Long Island and the Rockaway Peninsula and as of tonight, There still are 400,000 people without power, including almost all of the Rockaway Peninsula.  The failure of LIPA to have strengthened their electrical grid system after being devastated by Hurricane Gloria in 1985 is unacceptable.  

Gasoline Distribution System:

Only the NYC Metropolitan area has experienced a gasoline shortage.  Gasoline is plentiful in areas that were harder hit than NYC, like Atlantic City.  In fact New Jersey Governor Christie stated that south of I-195, gas was plentiful and North of I-84 the same was true in New York and Connecticut.

Chancellor Dennis Walcott:
The only time he has appeared in this crisis is when he is standing behind the Mayor in his press conference.  The Chancellor has been relegated to being a non-entity and it was under his inept leadership that principals and teachers were sent an email at 12 midnight by the DOE  to tell the time to show up in school at 10am to do nothing the next day.

Overall, we all are losers but these are the biggest losers of them all.

Educators 4 Excellence Is A Cancer To Our Union.

After the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy as the metropolitan area struggles to get back on their collective feet.  Educators4Excellence (E4E) issued one of their  self-serving statements that it was happy that the E4E team came out unscathed.  I guess the sixty people who died in the NYC Metropolitan area, including a teacher at the Brooklyn High School of Social Justice, don't count since none of them are E4E members.  Talking about E4E membership?  How many teachers are actually E4E members?  Fifty? One Hundred?, Five Hundred? Better yet, how many are really active classroom teachers?  I bet it is less than one hundred and of those, most are probably Teach For America "newbies" who can't wait to get out of the classroom and won't be teaching three years from now.  Regardless of how many active members there are in E4E, one thing is clear, this group, or as I call them, a cult is anti-union and gets their funding from corporate and hedge fund education reformer groups.

Time and again E4E is invited to various panel discussions by Education reform groups and has little good to say about our union rights and proposes policies that eliminate many of our  "due process protections". In fact, they are the darlings of many education reform organizations and their policy papers reflect the agenda of education reformers.For example, they supported the repeal of LIFO and were a prime supporter of Mayor Bloomberg's infamous LIFO bill. They also agreed with the education reformers that a merit pay plan should be implemented, including higher initial salaries for "newbies" but no step increases for experienced teachers.  Moreover, they believe the nonsense that a "great teacher" is more important than poverty in student academic achievement.As for the ATRs?  The ATRs should be given six months to find a job or be terminated.

For some reason our union, the UFT, has tried to reach out to E4E and include them as part of the union body.  In fact one of E4E's failed teachers who couldn't even gain tenure before abandoning the classroom, Rubin Brosbe, has his blog included in the union's Unity caucus Edwize blog for NYC teachers.  In my opinion E4E is not like the loyal opposition caucuses like ICE, TJC, or more recently MORE.  E4E is  a union-destroying cult who is a cancerous tumor in the UFT body and needs to be removed from our union.    E4E is a "tool" for the corporate elite who control the eduction reform agenda and is a danger to all teachers and it is the union's responsibility to kick them out before E4E's fifth columnist activities destroys the union from the inside just as cancer does to the human body.

South Bronx School and Accountable Talk  have many more articles about E4E and they are a must read.

Has The Rubber Room Agreement Worked? The Answer Is A Qualified Yes. But.......

There seems to be some disagreement on whether the "rubber room agreement" of April 2010 has actually achieved its purpose of expediting cases of  teachers who are accused of misconduct or incompetence within a 60 day period.once it is presented to an Arbitrator.  By and large the "rubber room agreement" has achieved that purpose.  However, the Arbitration part of the 3020-a process is just a piece of the teacher disciplinary process.  For example the DOE can take their time in investigating the accusation against the teacher by asking OSI or SCI to investigate the misconduct charge while having the teacher removed until the investigation process is concluded.  Just ask Francesco Portelos  For SCI investigations, it can take up to a year to complete. Moreover, if the teacher is charged criminally, the DOE can sit back and wait for the conclusion of the criminal case before charging the teacher with misconduct. I personally know of one case where a teacher has been sitting in a network office for three years after being charged criminally.  However, he was cleared by a Grand Jury and no criminal charges were filed. Still the DOE has not moved forward to either charge the teacher with misconduct under section 3020-a or send him back to school.  Furthermore, the DOE and UFT can't seem to keep their arbitrators who do not like the idea of waiting years to be paid by the State and the few arbitrators that oversee the cases have full schedules. Therefore, there is a long wait for cases to be assigned to the few arbitrators available for the 3020-a process.



 Has the "rubber room agreement" worked?  The answer is a qualified yes when it comes to the length of the Arbitration process but teachers can still sit for years before the 3020-a arbitration process actually begins.

Sorry Bloomie But Hurricane Sandy Is More Powerful Then You.

On Saturday Mayor Bloomberg was downplaying the potential  impact of Hurricane Sandy on New York City by claiming he had no intention of closing NYC schools. He further stated that when there was a transit strike, he kept the schools open, even if the Governor does shut down mass transit in the City.   He also said that he will be sending NYC workers upstate to help other communities, as if they are not needed here.  Finally, he claimed that Hurricane Sandy will have a less of an impact on New York City than a weakening Tropical Storm Irene of last year. Wishful thinking if you ask me

Two days later, an intensifying and massive Hurricane Sandy, with 90 mile per hour winds, slammed into the New Jersey shore, near Atlantic City and caused tropical storm force winds from Massachusetts to Virgina, massive power blackouts, storm surges, and extensive flooding to New York City.  In response the Mayor was forced to close schools for both Monday and Tuesday. The Holland and Brooklyn-Battery Tunnels are closed, with many of the NYC bridges slated to close by 7pm. Sustained tropical storm force winds of 50-60 mph with gusts exceeding hurricane force are being experienced in the metropolitan area.  The Triborough Bridge recorded a wind gust of over 100 miles per hour!

I guess Mayor moneybags got it very wrong when it came to Hurricane Sandy's impact on New York City. It just shows that he knows just as little about meteorology as he does about education.

Will Hurricane Sandy Close The New York City Schools? The Answer Is Yes!

It appears certain that Hurricane Sandy, now known as the "Frankenstorm" will impact the New York City metropolitan Area with tropical storm force winds of 50+ mph and torrential rains of 5"-10", along with major flooding.  The question on everybody's mind is "will the Mayor close the schools"? My best guess is yes for either Monday or Tuesday but not both days.

According to the Mayor, the MTA will close down public transportation when winds exceed 39 mph and that is an almost a certainty as the Hurricane reaches the Delaware/New Jersey coast on Monday.  Even if the winds don't reach tropical force in the morning, it will by the time school lets out in the afternoon.  The last thing the Mayor wants to be remembered for is how he stranded children in school with no mass transit to get them home. Therefore, it would appear that the Mayor will very reluctantly will close he schools on Monday but because he will not allow schools to be closed for two days.  The Mayor will make every effort to open them Tuesday and pressure the MTA to provide mass transit, despite the tropical force winds and torrential rains that will cause massive flooding throughout the City.  Alternatively, if the storm slows a little, the tropical storm force winds may not occur until after the evening rush hour.  In that case, the Mayor will keep the schools open on Monday and probably close them on Tuesday.

Interestingly, the Mayor in his 6:30pm press conference downplayed the storm's impact by claiming it will hit Maryland or Delaware not New Jersey as the National Weather Service's track shows and appear optimistic that the City will not be severely affected by the storm.  i did think he is crazy if the MTA shuts down and he expects the students to get to school in a hurricane but then it is money first and "children last" for the Mayor. I guess we will see as Sandy gets closer to the City.

Remember, the New York City schools serve two purposes,  The first as a "babysitting service" and second a "money machine".  Closing the schools cost the City money as parents must stay home to care for their children and the City loses funding from the State.  Therefore, it is in the Mayor's economic interest to keep the New York City Schools open. I suspect that the Mayor will not issue the order to close the schools until Late Sunday night at the earliest as he and many others hope that Hurricane Sandy miss the City.  Consequently, it will be interesting to see when and if the Mayor actually closes the schools or he will expose the children to the severe weather just for a few dollars.

To get the latest on Hurricane Sandy from the National Hurricane Center, it is here.

Update:  In his 11:24am press conference the Mayor realized he was too optimistic and has announced that the schools will be closed Monday and it doesn't look good for Tuesday either.

Another Nail In The Coffin Of Mayor Bloomberg's Education Policy.

The Annenberg Institute has released a devastating report that should put to rest the education reformers claim that a great teacher and not the community is the main factor in a student's educational development.     The report clearly shows that the community the student lived in was the most important factor in his or her academic achievement. For example in New York City the report showed that the majority Black and Latino communities in the City had college readiness rates mostly in the teens. while the mostly White and Asian communities had "college readiness rates" of over 50%.  The Coalition of Educational Justice has produced an interactive map for NYC that lists the "college readiness rates" for each neighborhood and can be found here.

The Annenberg Institute report showed that the student's zip code is the major factor in determining academic achievement and shows that ex Chancellor Joel Klein and Michelle Rhee's claim that “The single most important factor determining whether students succeed in school is not the color of their skin or their ZIP code or even their parents’ income – it is the quality of their teacher.” is simply false. There goes another myth by education reformers that has been refuted by real data. In fact the Mayor's policy of allowing students to travel to different high schools to escape their neighborhoods has proven to be a failure according to the report.  These students continue to underperformed academically and the report concluded that the Mayor's policy of closing large schools and open small schools had no effect on improving student outcomes. According to the report, the more educated the mother was, the more likely her children will have higher "college readiness scores". In other words, it's about the family, especially the mother's education.

In Queens let's look at some of the "college readiness rates"  by community:

Arubundale.....................................................56%
Bayside..........................................................63%
Bellerose/Floral Park.........................................46%
Broad Channel.................................................26%
Cambria Heights............................................ .19%
Clearview.......................................................60%
College Point..................................................39%
Corona..........................................................23%
Douglaston/Little Neck.....................................73%
Far Rockaway.................................................14% 
Elmhurst.........................................................38%
Flushing.........................................................53%
Forest Hills.....................................................59%
Fresh Meadows...............................................59% 
Glendale........................................................46%
Glen Oaks......................................................37%
Hillcrest.........................................................45%
Howard Beach................................................33%
Hunters Point.................................................20%
Jackson Heights.............................................53%
Jamaica........................................................26%
Kew Gardens.................................................45%
Laurelton......................................................19%
Long Island City/Astoria..................................31%
Maspeath.....................................................34%
Middle Village................................................41%
Oakland Gardens............................................65%
Ozone Park...................................................34%
Queens Village...............................................37%
Queensboro Hill..............................................45%
Rego Park......................................................55%
Richmond Hill.................................................29%
Ridgewood....................................................35%
Rockaway Park..............................................50%
Rosedale......................................................17%
South Jamaica..............................................19%
South Ozone Park..........................................27%
Springfield Gardens........................................16%
St. Albans....................................................15%
Suunyside....................................................43%.
Whitestone..................................................55%
Woodhaven..................................................36%
Woodside.....................................................39%

The "college readiness scores" show that in predominately White/Asian communities had rates above 50% while the predominately black communities had rates below 20%.  Interestingly, Latino communities had significantly higher "college readiness scores" than Black communities, at least in Queens.

The Annenberg Institute study just hammers another nail in the coffin of the Mayor's failed education policy and the education reformer myth that a great teacher not poverty is the main factor in student academic success.

Another Failure Of Mayor Bloomberg's Education Policy - Youth Disconnection Rates.

A study was produced by the Measure For America Organization that showed that New York City was in the bottom group, ranked a dismal seventeenth out of twenty-five major urban areas when it came to disconnected youth. How is disconnected youth defined?  It includes youth between the ages of 16 to 24 who are not in school and have no job.  For New York City to be in the lower part of all the nation's major cities shows a serious failure of the Mayor's education policy.

The New York City numbers are dismal indeed.  According to the study New York City's disconnected youth rate averaged 15.1% while so-called inferior metropolitan areas such as Baltimore (14.2%) , Chicago (13.3%), and Philadelphia (11.9%) had lower disconnected youth rates.  Even Boston (9.0%) and Washington D.C. (11.3%) beat New York City.  Had Mayor Bloomberg's education policy worked, you would think that New York City would compare very favorably to other major cities when it came to disconnected youth rates but the fact is it doesn't.  The reason is that while the Bloomberg Administration claims that the high school graduation rate has increased, the reality is that only 22.7% of these graduates are considered "college and career ready".

What are the New York City youth disconnection rates?

1. Black.........................................21.7%
2. Latino........................................20.6%
3. Asian...........................................9.8%
4. White...........................................9.8%

While in one South Bronx community the youth disconnection rate is an astounding 35.6%! and New York City had one of the worst disconnection rates for Latinos compared to all other metropolitan areas.

It is very obvious if the Bloomberg education reform policy had actually worked, the New York City disconnected youth rates would be lower and the racial gap would be closing.  Instead the New York City disconnected youth rates are higher than sixteen of the twenty four other cities analyzed, and  the racial disconnected youth gap between Blacks and Latinos and Whites is wider in New York City than the nation as a whole.

Below are the comparisons between New York City and the National youth disconnection rate gap.





NYC  Gap.....................................................National  Gap

Blacks/Whites   11.9%..........................................10.8%
Latinos/Whites  10.8%............................................6.8%

While I cannot make a direct correlation between education and youth disconnection rates, it certainly is a major factor in New York City's dismal showing in providing a solid foundation both educationally, and providing proper services  to these disconnected youth.  This study just supports that Bloomberg;s claim of academic success during his Administration is simply false.

From Hell To Heaven

I am now in a school for the 2012-13 year that is considered one of the top schools in Queens, even if it is a bit overcrowded.  I felt welcomed by the staff and supported by the school's Administration.  Moreover, the Chapter Leader is highly effective and keeps the members informed of issues concerning the school and the staff by sending emails on a weekly basis.  The fact that this school is only one of two with a working teachers cafeteria is a major plus.  Finally, there is ample parking around the school and I can park my car within two blocks of the school.during the day.  Of course, the most attractive part of the school is the student body that is academically successful and college bound.

My students are, for the most part, well-behaved and respectful.  Many of them are  English Language Learners and show a great deal of effort in trying to pick up the English language instruction while being successful academically.  I am very impressed with their diligence in absorbing instruction and taking academics seriously.  Just as important, I am in one room for most of the day and the students show up on time and have good work habits. I feel like I have died and gone to heaven and consider myself very lucky indeed teaching in this school.

By contrast, I was in a failing school for the 2011-12 year that treated me very disrespectfully,  This "D" rated school, with a single digit "college and career readiness score", it should have been given an "F" rating, did not give me support of any kind, including no team teacher in my CTT class.. Furthermore, and even worse the Administration let the students roam the halls and show up to class when they pleased. I have previously posted about my time in this school and have little good to say about the failing school.  It really was a hellhole and even with new Administration the existing students are very academically and behaviorally challenged, with poor work habits, as the school took in "over the counter" students no other school wanted because of their academics and or behaviors.  In addition,  many of the school's top students expressed a desire to leave the school as it went through the ill-advised "Turnaround process".  This school is in real danger of closing and the clock is ticking and the already rock bottom staff morale will only get worse.

I look at it this way.  I paid my dues working in hellhole high and now I am in heavenly high and hope to stay there until I am ready to retire.

ATRs Needs To Know Their Rights As They Travel Weekly To Different Schools.

There is some confusion on what the ATR rights and responsibilities are when doing their weekly assignments at a school.  Too many times I  am hearing that ATRs are being used in duties that no teacher in the school are doing.  Why the union has not printed an easy to read "ATR Bill of Rights" is troubling.  It's as if the union rather not let ATRs know what they are required to do and what are not appropriate duties.  While, for the present, I am in a Provisional position in an excellent school for the school year and don't have to travel to schools weekly, I do understand the frustration of not knowing what an ATR responsibility is.and hope to clarify this somewhat in this post.

ATRs are teachers: That means that you have the rights of the teachers in your school.  You have a lunch, preparation, and professional period just like all other teachers.  If the other teachers meet ot tutor during the professional period so should you if asked. 

ATRs should be paid for six periods:  Many schools try to give ATRs six periods and unless the school is willing to pay a coverage/per session for the sixth period the ATR should seek out the Chapter Leader to file a grievance if the school refuses to take away the sixth period.  An exception is when the classroom teacher has a 4-6 schedule where one day the teacher has four periods and another day six periods.  Since the teacher does not get a sixth period pay boost, the ATR does not either.

ATRs should not be doing cafeteria duty: Almost all schools are pushing cafeteria duty on the ATRs and that is a shame. In some cases the ATRs are doing five classes and cafeteria duty! Unless cafeteria duty is a circular six assignment for all teachers, the ATR should see the Chapter Leader about having the cafeteria duty removed from his or her schedule.   In no case should the ATR do more than one circular six assignment and that includes cafeteria duty or. hall patrol.  Clerical work is usually not a teacher duty and you can refuse to do it but most ATRs don't seem to mind and if you do, tell the Chapter Leader to eliminate that assignment..

ATRs should bring a generic lesson plan with them at all times:  While it is the school's responsibility to provide the ATR with the lesson and supplies, many schools refuse to do so.  Therefore, it is important that the ATR bring their own lessons

ATRs should have a bathroom key: Many ATRs complain that the school claims they do not have extra bathroom keys and the ATR is at the mercy of other teachers to use the teacher's bathroom.  The Chapter Leader should be making sure that each ATR has a bathroom key during their wweekly assignments.

ATRs should have one time schedule in mufti-session schools: Some high schools require ATRs to call in for their schedule, early or late.  The ATR must remind the school that they are on one schedule only and should call up on Friday and let the payroll Secretary or APO know that.


Meet the Chapter Leader:  One of the first things an ATR should do is contact the Chapter Leader and make sure their rights are being met.  While it is true that some Chapter Leaders are "in bed with the Administration" most are not and are advocates for the staff, including the ATRs.  The Chapter Leader is the first line of defense against school Admiinistration abuses and the union does encourage the Chapter Leaders to make the ATRs feel welcome and represented during their weekly stay.

Leave a good impression:  It is no secret that ATRs have a bad reputation and principals will find any excuse not to hire an ATR based upon this false belief started by former Chancellor Joel Klein letter to the principals back in 2006 and enhanced by Mayor Michael Bloomberg.  However, if you are reliable, dependable, available, and a team player sometimes the Principal will remember you and give you a chance to show your classroom ability for a long term assignment.  That is how I obtained my provisional assignment at the school I am in now.

The "mandated Interview": An ATR does not need to go to a job interview except if it is within their own District. However, as a curtsey, you should respond to the interview by politely refusing to meet with the Principal, unless you really want to go to the school.

As An ATR You Do Not Need To Accept An offer to fill a vacancy or long-term leave replacement. The ATR Agreement plainly states that both sides must think it is a good fit to fill a vacancy.  Therefore, as an ATR you can refuse the school's offer to fill the position, if the school is not appropriate for you. However, it is best if you simply tell the Principal you don't want the position and usually the Principal will release you rather than waiting for the union to get you out of the school.

Philip Nobile in the NYCATR blog made some of these points previously as I did as well but this post was to try to put everything together as an outline that all ATRs and Chapter Leaders can follow and I hope this helps and pushes the union to make an offical document that can be given to all ATRs, Chapter Leaders, and principals on how ATRs can be used in their schools.

The union really needs to publish an "ATR Bill of Rights" that tells the ATR what they can or cannot do in their weekly assignments.

Ex-Chancellor Joel Klein Exposed As A Fraud.

Former New York City Chancellor Joel Klein wrote an autobiography on his life and it turns out that much of what he wrote appears to be a severe distortion of reality.  A journalist and author Richard Rothstein actually researched the facts about Joel Klein's public school days and found out that the ex-Chancellor's claim that he was an indifferent student, lived in public housing for low income people, and was a street kid was far from the truth.  Instead the Chancellor grew up in a two family household, with the father having a federal civil service postal job, and his mother a bookkeeper which placed him in a solidly middle class family situation. He was a high achieving student as early as sixth grade as he was in an accelerated program that squeezed three years of learning into two and was called the Special Progress class, starting in the seventh grade that only the highest achieving students were accepted in. Joel Klein was an Indifferent student? Yeah right, another lie. Moreover, Joel Klein grew up in a middle class 87% white public housing development not a low income minority project like he leads one to believe.  In fact the Woodside Houses applicant needed to meet very stringent conditions.  Here are just some of the 21 factors that can disqualify an applicant at the Woodside Housing Complex.

• Single parent families
• Inadequate income
• Irregular employment history
• Out of wedlock births
• Criminal record
• Drug addiction
• Mental illness
• Poor housekeeping record from previous landlords
• Badly behaved children
• Poor parenting skills

Obviously, this is almost the exact opposite of what we think of public housing today.  Is it little wonder that the ex Chancellor had an excellent environment to blossom as a child?  His claim that he lived in poverty and was a street kid is a sick joke at best.

Why would he exaggerate his childhood experience in New York City?  The answer is that he wants to show that children growing up in the low income, minority projects of the present can succeed just like him and therefore if they only had better teachers to guide and help these children, then they can overcome poverty and be a leader too Furthermore, it makes a good story, even if it is a fairy tale, and his lies have convinced various politicians like Mayor Michael Bloomberg,  Education Secretary Arnie Duncan, and President Obama himself.  No wonder the education reformers look to him to debunk the poverty argument with their "no excuses" slogan.

It is one thing for Joel Klein to falsely claim that he improved New York City Public School education when he was the Chancellor but it is another thing to mislead the public on his childhood upbringing as if he has anything in common with the single family childern that are growing up in a crime-ridden low income minority housing project and lives in poverty.  To me ex Chancellor Joel Klein is a fraud.

You Get What You Pay For When You Practice Education On The Cheap Policies.

It is no secret that the DOE's "fair student funding" fiasco has encouraged principals to hire on the cheap when it comes to teachers.  Many of the Bloomberg small schools are populated with "newbie teachers" and at the high school level that is a real crime when it comes to the education of the students in those schools.  Is it any wonder that the "college and career readiness" rates for those small schools are 10.7%, compared to the 20.7% for all New York City high schools?

An example of this problem was played out in a recently created small school that is one of the small schools replacing a closing school that was targeted by the DOE.  In this school, only in it's third year of existence, the school had recently excessed an experienced Physics teacher because the teacher failed half the students and obtained poor Regents results.  Was he a terrible teacher?  Well, I taught with him for eight years and he always obtained good Regents grades in Physics and rarely failed students at the closing school that the new school now occupies.  The real answer was the students of this new Bloomberg small school.lack the academic ability to handle the math and scientific concepts necessary for high school Physics.  However, it is always easier to blame the teacher than the ill-prepared student body.

To replace the excessed Physics teacher, the school hired two "newbie science teachers", one in Chemistry and the other in Earth Science.  My friend, the ATR was assigned to the school for the first five weeks and the Principal had asked him to shadow the two teachers and help them adjust to the New York City classroom.  He did as he was told but found that both teachers lacked pedagogy, had poor knowledge of the curriculum, and had terrible classroom management skills.  The Chemistry teacher was foreign born and had trouble with the English language and made many grammatical errors when trying to explain Chemistry..  However, what was worse that he made science errors such as telling the students that Helium is la lighter gas than Hydrogen, despite what the Periodic Tables of Chemistry shows.   Moreover, his classroom was noisy and the students were distracted and not engaged.  My friend felt very sorry for those Chemistry students.  He believed they are in for a long and frustrating year.

The Earth Science teacher was a "wet behind the years" newbie who looked like she should be a student rather than a teacher.  Worse was her apparent lack of curriculum knowledge when she incorrectly told her students that latitude were vertical lines and longitude horizontal lines.  The opposite is true.  In addition, she could not run the lab and screwed up a simple density experiment.  Like the Chemistry teacher she had trouble controlling the classroom, seemed very frustrated,  and keeping the students engaged was difficult. My friend doubts she will be teaching next year.

My friend, who is a twenty-two year Science teacher, said to the Principal why did you hire the two science teachers when there are so many good science teachers without classrooms?  The Principal was blunt, she told him that her budget is very tight and she could not afford to pick up a higher salaried teacher, no matter how great the teacher may be.  She felt badly that she could not hire the "best teachers" but the budget made it impossible to do so.  Her parting words to my friend was that she wished she could keep him around to work with the two teachers but the DOE does not allow for it without picking up his salary which she cannot afford.

Is it any wonder why the small schools do so poorly when it comes to "college and career readiness"?  When teachers are selected based upon their salary and not on their ability, the future looks bleak for those students that end up in these small schools. 

Just Another Case Of The DOE's Double Standard.

In Sunday's New York Post there was a story of a highly regarded high school guidance counselor, named Tiffany Webb, (37 years old)  who was not granted tenure because of her past history as a lingerie and underwear model when she was in her late teens (18-20 years old).  In fact, according to the article she was removed from the New York City schools and sent to the "rubber room" two different times for a year long stay during her teaching career because of those photos as they circulated on the Internet without her approval.  Eventually one of the students in her last school Murry Bergtraum High School found the pictures of the guidance counselor on the Internet and gave it to the now ex-Principal of the school who not only refused to give her tenure but  proceeded to terminate her.  Ms. Webb was forced to leave the school system, despite previously being a  teacher for ten years.  Apparently, her journey between elementary, middle, and high schools as well as a two year stay in the infamous "rubber room" as a teacher never earned her tenure protection before she became a guidance counselor.  .Now you know why tenure is so important!

Ms. Webb was hired as a teacher in 1999 and disclosed her previous employment as a model wearing scantly clad undies.  Apparently, the DOE did investigate her and gave her a clean bill of health to work in the New York City schools. However, pictures of her continued to circulate throughout the Internet in some less than reputable web sites and resulted in her being removed to the "rubber room" on two separate occasions as the DOE checked out if these photos of her were actually porn. The DOE investigation concluded that the photos did not constitute porn and she was at least eighteen when the photos were taken and the case appeared to be closed.  However, Ms. Webb decided to become a guidance counselor and despite excellent work and being highly regarded, the ex-Principal Andrea Lewis refused to give her tenure and she was instead terminated for  "conduct unbecoming a DOE employee".  The reason, because her unauthorized photos can be found by students on the Internet, how lame. She is now suing in court and I wish her well since she has been wronged and should get her job back with pay and damages.

This is yet again another case of the DOE "double standard" as administrators and managers get a pass for misdeeds while school staff are terminated for the most frivolous and innocent actions and in Ms.Webb's case legal employment that somebody in the DOE twisted and perverted into something seemingly evil. Which person would you rather your child be with Ms. Webb or these two DOE employees?  Here and Here? The answer is very obvious, Ms. Webb by far.

Mayor Bloomberg's Education Legacy Will Go Down As A Failed Attempt In Education Reform.

The Mayor's attempt to change the New York Public School System has been shown to be a failure and the latest polling numbers have shown that only 29% of the general public believe he has done a fair to good job when it comes to education.  While the Mayor points to the bogus high school graduation rate as a measure of success, most educators realize that the graduation numbers are heavily influenced by loads of "credit recovery" that in some cases consisted of going on a computer of a couple of days to get credits. However, real academic achievement under the Bloomberg Administration has found to be elusive at best and non-existent for the most part.  Let's look at his failure to improve student academic achievement in his twelve year tenure.

Student Academic Achievement:  Only 20.7% of high school graduates are considered "college and career ready".  Worse, the Bloomberg touted small schools have an astounding 10.7% college and career readiness" score.  That means only one out of every ten small school students are ready for the real world beyond high school.

Racial/Income Achievement gap: The academic achievement gap between Blacks/Hispanics and Whites/Asians are as wide as ever and lately has actually widened!  So much for narrowing the gap.

SAT Scores: The latest SAT scores were a disappointment to the City as the State scores inched upward the City scores either stayed flat or fell not good when you claim that education reform will make all learners academically proficient.

College Readiness:: For the half of the New York City students who go to college, a mind blowing 22.6% of them must take triple remediation courses in Math, English, and Writing just to qualify for college credit courses.  I would not be too anxious to take credit for such an abysmal failure rate.

College Dropout Rate: The majority of New York City students that go to community college never finish.  According to the latest information 51% of the students drop out of community colleges and only 28% actually achieve a two or four year degree.

Tight School Budgets: Under the Mayor, school principals have been faced with increasingly tight budgets and some of their resources must pay for unwanted and unneeded services from their Children First Networks that can siphon as much as 15% of their budgets.  Furthermore, the much touted "Race to the Top" funds, which New York City received $300 million was not used for the classroom but, according to Eric Nudelstein in Schoolbook, was squandered by the Mayor and Tweed into top down imposed questionable programs and ill-fitted Common Core requirements that showed no academic effects in the classroom.

Class Sizes: The failure to reduce and in some cases increased class sizes will be the legacy of failure associated with the Bloomberg Administration.  In the Mayor's attempt to vilify teachers and not replace teachers who left the system, class sizes have gradually increased over the Mayor's last term and is the highest in the State.  See Leonie Haimson's testimony about class size issues.

Closing Schools: One of the Mayor's lasting hallmarks will be the closing of schools that didn't meet his standards and had Tweed make sure schools he targeted for closing would be starved of resources and given a large percentage of potentially low achieving ELL and Special Education students.  Jamaica High School is a textbook case of how the DOE goes about destroying a school they want closed.

 In summary, the Mayor's education is a failure and deserves the grade of "F"

The Chancellor Is A Hypocrite As He Protected An Administrator Accused Of An Inappropriate Relationship With A Student.

Chancellor Dennis Walcott has showed his true colors by treating Administrators differently than teachers.   Now here is another case of an Assistant Principal who admitted to having an "inappropriate relationship" with a female student and the Chancellor failed to have him removed until the beginning of the school year. This "double standard" has shown up yet again as the Chancellor has different rules for teachers and administrators. Yes, this is the very same Chancellor who demands the authority to arbitrarily fire any teacher accused of such accusations.  In fact, this is what the Chancellor actually said in March of this year.

"I am not going to tolerate any individual having any improper contact with any of our students,” 

I guess Administrators were not included in this statement since the Chancellor failed to remove an Assistant Principal, Christan Del Re, from Leon M. Goldstein High School after being informed that he and the student sent almost 3,000 text messages to each other, had numerous late night phone calls, with one lasting nearly three hours, and other students seeing the girl leaving with him in his car by herself.   Instead the Chancellor lamely explained his failure to remove the Assistant Principal by claiming the severity of the accusations did not require his removal.  Who is he kidding?  Why is the Chancellor now trying to fire the Assistant Principal under section 3020-a if it was not severe enough to remove him?

According to the report the Assistant Principal and the girl texted each other almost 3,000 times and late night phone calls after midnight.  This is not a made up story but actual fact, yet the hypocrite Chancellor does not consider this as severe as lets say an expression of praise by a teacher in front of thirty other students in a classroom. According to the SCI report as stated in the Daily News the Assistant Principal had an "inappropriate relationship" that included thousands of text messages, numerous phone calls as late as 3 a.m, one that lasted nearly three hours and the Assistant Principal's admission of the "inappropriate relationship".  Yet with all these "facts on the ground" our hypocrite Chancellor refused to remove the Assistant Principal.

This is just the latest example of the "double standard" when disciplining teachers and Administrators by the Bloomberg/Walcott Administration. Other examples can be found Here, Here, Here, and Here.